Rush Judgment

Matt Drudge seems to have his panties in a knot over the recent Saturday Night Live skit depicting his old pal Rush "Lorcet" Limbaugh:

BACKSTAGE CONTROVERSY AFTER NBC DEPICTION OF LIMBAUGH

NBC's comedy depiction of talkradio king Rush Limbaugh passed-out in vomit from drug abuse ignited backstage outrage at SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE.

The animated sketch left one senior production source stunned and outraged, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

"Would we have done this to [John] Belushi? [Chris] Farley?" the source said on Sunday from New York.

The source asked not to be identified fearing retribution from SNL's executive producer Lorne Michaels.

"We've had more fu**ing drug addicts on this show through the years... more tragedy. I have lost count. Did we ever have some laughs about Robert Downey Jr.'s serious drug addiction?"

The crass montage which aired on NBC featured Limbaugh vomiting from drugs on a bathroom floor, in an apparent overdose.

Last year, Limbaugh announced to his radio audience that he was seeking treatment for an addiction to pain medication.

Calls to Michaels office went unreturned late Sunday.

Developing...

With all due respect to your "journalistic integrity," Mr. Drudge, I would point out some issues I have with your news bulletin.

-- An unnamed source on SNL? Sounds like a perfect cover to spout your own opinion - which is actually a talking point handed down from your keepers. Your "story" is about a staffer who didn't like the skit?? No, of course not. Your story is about the skit itself, which you find objectionable because it reminds people of the hypocrisy of one of the poster boys for the right wing noise machine. Personally, I don't believe the "outraged" staffer even exists. But you can go ahead and hide behind that same curtain of source protection that has saved Robert Novak's fat butt so far.

-- The objection does have the slightest tinge of truth to it - which makes it all the more dangerous. In bringing up Belushi and Farley, you try to equate their tragedies with Limbaugh's addiction. On the face of it, this almost makes sense. But there is a problem here. As far as I can remember, John Belushi and Chris Farley never claimed to be paragons of virtue and certainly never used a national radio program (or their own movies, albums, etc.) to rail against the people who had the misfortune to become addicts. The thing that makes making fun of Rush - well - funny, is that he is a hypocrite of the greatest magnitude. All the time that he was screaming about addicts, he was one himself. That is pure comedy gold, baby:

"Too many whites are getting away with drug use, too many whites are getting away with drug sales, too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river"

"Send the people who want to do drugs to London and Zurich, and let's be rid of them."

"Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up."

One more thing: depicting Limbaugh as a puppet in the skit is also a great touch, and much closer to the truth. He is a windbag of immense proportions, but all of his commentary and talking points come straight from the noise machine -- as do yours.



Display:


Censorship is poor taste (none / 0)

Tito, I like your article, but let's be careful not to get caught in the Drudge-Limbaugh (or "Matt Rush") frame.

Drudge is trying to frame the issue as "laughing at drug addicts is poor taste". As you point out, this is a straw man - what SNL is laughing at is hypocrisy, not addiction. And ridiculing hypocrisy is the primary mission of satire, while fighting against that ridicule is the mission of censorship and totalitarian regimes.

So we should reframe the issue: all censorship is in poor taste. Even if the anonymous staffer exists, his view is as suitable to print as a tirade of slurs and expletives. By "reporting" those remarks, Drudge is simply providing a public toilet wall for tasteless grafitti.

Oh, by the way, we must anticipate the "tolerate the intolerant" argument: some smartalec will call this frame a form of censorship. To which I say: Did you see me demolish public toilets? On the contrary, I respect their useful function. I just want the sign on them to say "rest room", not "press room".

by enfant terrible on Tue Dec 21, 2004 at 10:28:18 AM EST

Belushi and Farley are Dead (none / 0)

Rush is alive and well and rich and getting married to some hottie from CNN and is therefore totally fair game. I'm shocked some idiot from SNL doesn't get comedy. No wait, I'm not shocked, SNL blows.
I am The Etchasketchist!
by Jumbo on Tue Dec 21, 2004 at 12:51:05 PM EST

Did Drudge defend Keith Richards, too? (none / 0)

If we are supposedly looking at just the issue of Rush's drug usage, what exactly is the difference between Rush and Keith Richards?

SNL has mocked Keith Richards' drug abuse issues 3 times by three different people on SNL, including one impression by Mick Jagger.

David Crosby's drug issues have been mocked twice.

http://snl.jt.org/imp/listimp.phtml

by afs on Tue Dec 21, 2004 at 01:41:08 PM EST

Re: What about Gilda as Patti Smith? (none / 0)

Puking onstage? That was hilarious, and Patti Smith is one of my favorites.

Long time ago, though.

by TrainWreck on Tue Dec 21, 2004 at 05:17:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

SO CALLED CNN HOTTIE?? IF ITS DARIN KAGEN SHE.... (none / 0)

used to look really nice but have noticed

lately she seems a bit frazzeled..hair

dried out...quick on her comments...God

Darin ..not reported much because of the

drugs but if you read the esquire piece

he sexually assaulted his drug connect...

I think Limbaugh does not respect women

Darin run...or out fox:) the s.o.b. his last

ex got millions.

by Aslanspal on Tue Dec 21, 2004 at 02:19:20 PM EST

Daryn's just bitter she's not Mary Hart (none / 0)

The only time Daryn Kagan drops that permanently etched sneer is when she gets to go cover the Oscars or some movie star comes into the studio. She obviously wanted to be an Entertainment Tonight anchor and be with and be one of the beautiful people.

Daryn Kagan is a parody of herself.

by afs on Tue Dec 21, 2004 at 02:31:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: SO CALLED CNN HOTTIE?? IF ITS DARIN KAGEN SHE. (none / 0)

please advise: what Esquire piece on Rush????? when?
by bigdogjunior1963 on Tue Dec 21, 2004 at 02:35:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Everyone had a Daryn Kagan in their High School (none / 0)

Remember that ever-present, bitter, ugly friend of the cheerleaders in your high school? Daryn Kagan.
by afs on Tue Dec 21, 2004 at 02:37:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

overlook the words themselves- you know Drudge (none / 0)

lies, we all know that. Look, though, at the method:
a. invent an SNL staffer
b. introduce a scenario where Rush gets sympathy as an addict
c. erase the memory of him as the guy who screamed at his maid and made her score thousands of pills illegally.

THIS IS WHAT THEY DO.
I will be shunned for what I'm about to say. I accept that.
THIS IS WHAT THEY DO.
WHY DON'T WE?
They lie, they invent things, they send out fake Dem fliers saying the Bible will be banned-
and it's smart, it's good strategy, and we will keep getting beaten until we start fighting back.
What did the partisans in France during WW2 do? They went after the symbols, the examples, the bigmouths.
Why isn't Rush in jail yet? he's guilty. You and I both know it, everybody knows it. Florida probably has Sleepy O'Naptime investigating and his brother, Slowpoke von Lawfirm is the prosecutor. Is there any reason we can't help things along with a healthy infusion of cash? Is it illegal for common citizens to help local law enforcement build a case?
O'Lielly! Yes, he paid off for his falafel snacks. Why aren't UK papers running with this? They are safe from US libel suits! Do Europeans know about loofahs on big 'boobies'? and Matt Drudge....hooo, boy. or boys. whatever.
Coulter....you just KNOW she's up to some crazy domme/leather stuff in her Manhattan apartment- I've been around and I can tell a 'go-er' (nudge nudge, wink wink) when I see one. Who's been with her? Would they talk? Threeways? Ballgags? U-Boat Commander and shy Prussian milkmaid outfits??? Who can say? Go look, go see.
I get sick of us acting all Canadian. The right has always outdone us in the dirty tricks arena. We keep saying, well, gee, I don't want to play if I have to do that to win....
FIRST RULE OF A GUNFIGHT: BRING A GUN.
We are in a gunfight, folks. If you want to play nice, keep avoiding the facts- these people HATE us.
We could make them dance.
Did I hear somebody say -secret funds (non-governmental, and if it's good enough for Grover Norquist...)? Private Investigators? Scandals? Think of how this would boost our grassroots morale for all those good Dems in Red states- cut 'their' funding (who wants to give money to 'the falafel foundation for sexual harassment'? and undermine their moral authority!
Now, 'apres moi, le deluge', I get it. However, if anyone wants to discuss this...

by bigdogjunior1963 on Tue Dec 21, 2004 at 02:34:55 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.